The Genocide of Battered Mothers and their Children

Posts Tagged ‘abuser’

A Hard Hit to DV Victims by The Criminal Justice System in Kansas

In domestic law on September 19, 2011 at 12:18 pm

Or suppose the judge just released your abuser from custody saying “Awww, forget it, case dismissed” because s/he knew that the Prosecution wasn’t going to/couldn’t afford to prosecute it?

If that sounds like an improbable breakdown in our criminal justice system, check out what’s just gone down in Topeka, Kansas:

Amplify’d from

Until recent years Civics, Democracy and Criminal Justice were only topics from a class that I was supposed to be paying attention to when I was in high school.  Unable to see how any of it was going to really matter or have anything to do with my life, I opted to half-listen, paying just enough attention to catch the main concepts but spent more time passing notes, daydreaming and doodling the time away until the bell would release me from my imprisonment. 

I got that a misdemeanor wasn’t as bad as a felony and figured if I just steered clear of both, I should have no problem.  For those of you who were as interested as I was in high school about the criminal justice system, I offer you the following crash course before laying out what the newest alert is (so you can be as concerned about it as I am!)

While a misdemeanor is better known as “a lesser crime” in comparison to a felony the distinction goes just a tad bit further in that a misdemeanor is actually defined as a crime that could land a person in jail for less then a year as opposed to a felony that’s actually defined as a crime that could land a person in jail for more then a year

Murder is unanimously held as a felony across the United States, but otherwise the definition of crimes occurs at the state level.  So, for example, while it may seem that strangulation would be considered a felony (a more serious crime) it didn’t become a Class C felony (a sentence that can carry up to 5 years in jail) in Hawaii until relatively recently (2006).  Prior to 2006, can you imagine being strangled then being told it’s “just” a misdemeanor?

Even more disillusioning is landing/finding oneself in the criminal justice system (that has very little resemblance to what you see on “Law & Order”).  Actually, my brother-in-law (a corrections officer) and I recently ruined a criminal justice-related movie for my sister when we each piped up instinctually with “They can’t do that” or “That’d NEVER happen” comments throughout the movie and totally ruined it for my sister who was just trying to enjoy it for the plot and storyline.  (Sorry!)

In real-life, what’s supposed to happen when a crime occurs is someone notifies the police about “the offense” (proper terminology) and then the police will do an investigation (talk to the victim and/or alleged perpetrator if possible, gather evidence, interview witnesses, etc.) the findings of which will all this go into a report.  For simplicity’s sake, let’s say this is a misdemeanor where the alleged perpetrator is not arrested for whatever s/he’s been accused of.  The completed report then gets forwarded to the Prosecutor’s Office for review where the Prosecutor (called a District Attorney in other jurisdictions) will decide whether the offense contains enough merit to be prosecuted or not. 

Here’s a critical piece of information that many don’t realize: if the Prosecutor accepts the case and moves forward on it, the case “belongs” to the state NOT the victim whose been wronged; the victim becomes a witness for the state/prosecution. 

Why is this important?  Because in many domestic violence cases where the abuser is ignorant to all this, the abuser thinks that the victim can “call off” the Prosecution or that the victim has the ability to simply “drop” the case – neither of which are true – but from his perspective what’s true is irrelevant; what she does (or doesn’t do) is.  Can you see how this could shape up to be a pretty dangerous situation if an offense has occurred, the abuser HASN’T been arrested and then the Prosecutor decides to take the case?

Next step: court.  This is where the abuser enters a plea of either guilt, no contest (not admitting guilt but not proclaiming innocence either) or not guilty to what s/he’s being accused of.  If the abuser says “Not guilty” the next step is a trial where witnesses and evidence can be presented by the Prosecution and Defense BUT before the plea is formally entered a couple of “strange things” can happen…

The Defense OR Prosecution can propose a plea bargain where the abuser is afforded the opportunity to “plea down” to a lesser offense, ie: a domestic violence offense being reduced to harassment.  Plea bargains can be offered for a number of reasons, but the long-term consequences of a plea down from domestic violence doesn’t work well in addressing or rectifying the problem of DV.  If an abuser pleas down to harassment (for example) then there’s “no domestic violence” = no DV intervention services, the abuser will not reflect a DV history stemming from the offense and the record will not count the case as a DV one which can mislead the public in terms of misrepresenting the size of the problem (DV in the community isn’t as big of a problem as harassment is). 

Similar to dropping the case, the victim has no say or influence over plea bargaining (so if you’ve had the courage to take your case “all the way” and have cooperated with the Prosecution, can you imagine how it’d feel to be told by the Prosecution that your case has been “settled” because THE ABUSER’S agreeing to call what he did to you “harassment” rather than DV?  That instead of going to jail, the abuser has agreed to community service hours instead?  But it could be worse… 

How do you think it would feel as a victim if your DV case ended before it even started?  That after mustering up the courage to report to police who dutifully submitted their report to the Prosecutors, that it was turned away NOT for lack of evidence or witnesses but due to lack of funding?  (And how do you think your abuser’s going to feel knowing that you turned him in, tried to have him put away but failed so now he’s free to “talk” to you about it?)

Or suppose the judge just released your abuser from custody saying “Awww, forget it, case dismissed” because s/he knew that the Prosecution wasn’t going to/couldn’t afford to prosecute it?  If that sounds like an improbable breakdown in our criminal justice system, check out what’s just gone down in Topeka, Kansas:

Our criminal justice system was not founded upon dollars and cents and last I knew justice isn’t supposed to be decided after a cost-benefit analysis, but Kansas has just set a terrifying precedent by telling domestic violence victims that their lives – and the crimes committed against them – aren’t worth their state’s time, money or effort.  This is a sad day for domestic violence victims in Kansas and a day that I hope will never dawn here in Hawaii.

For a more formal/thorough explanation of the misdemeanor/felony processes in Hawaii, go to



Beware Family Court: What Victims and Advocates Should Know

In domestic law on July 1, 2011 at 4:33 am
Amplify’d from
In Family Court a Victim Is on Her Own Against the Abuser.
In Criminal Court it’s the State That Takes On the Abuser.

This is why criminal
cases are named in the form of ‘The People (meaning the
state or society) versus John Doe’, whereas family court
cases are named in the form of ‘Jane Doe versus John Doe’.

The criminal court
system pits the immense powers of the state against the accused.
In marked contrast, family court is merely a stage set by the
state where two private individuals can come to battle out their
personal differences, using their own devices, with the state
acting more as a weak referee, and wielding very little power.

Family court and criminal
court are profoundly different in premise, structure, power, and
purpose. The moment a victim steps into family court, whether
to seek a restraining order, custody and visitation rulings, a
divorce, or any other family court order regarding her abuser,
she’s literally opening the door for her abuser to launch unchecked
counterattacks against her, in an arena that was never designed
to deal with criminal dynamics, with the very real possibility
that the abuser may end up turning the family court against her.
In family court, an unprepared victim of family violence can be
as vulnerable to the perpetrator’s abuse as she is in the home.

Most people mistakenly
think that the difference between family court and criminal court
consists mainly in the different issues these courts deal with.
It’s a mistake that can seriously endanger victims of family violence
who too often trust that the family court system is built to protect
her in much the same way as the criminal system. Nothing could
be further from reality.

In family court, the
family issue at hand – whether custody, divorce, visitation, or
restraining orders, etc. – is deemed a private matter of such
minor consequence to the community that the two individuals in
a family court case are on their own; each responsible for investigating,
preparing, conducting, and defending their own cases. To be sure,
they are each free to hire their own private attorney to help
them if they wish – or if they can. But this factor also generally
serves to further disadvantage a victim of family violence and
to further empower a violent abuser, since it’s usually the abuser
who controls the family funds and can hire a private attorney,
and the victim who cannot.

In Family Court an Abuser can Launch Free Ranging Counterattacks
against the Victim.
In Criminal Court, Counterattacks by the Abuser Are Forbidden
or Tightly Restricted.



Court Appointed Child Abuser M. Jill Dykes Topeka Kansas

In domestic law on June 16, 2011 at 11:53 am

Rene M Netherton GAL Court Appointed Child Abuser

In domestic law on May 31, 2011 at 6:47 pm

Rene M Netherton | DOB 4/23/1957 | 5144 NE Shaffer Rd, Topeka, Kansas 66617 | Tel-(785) 267-6767 Fax-(785) 234-6768 Nethertonlaw@YAHOO.COM

Please be aware that many pages posted on the internet conerning myself, Rene M. Netherton, are actually posts that are true and accurate. I am full of vile, malicious, defamatory and disgusting comments in my  illegal and criminal activities
Any interested individual may merely google my name Rene Marie Netherton to see the other victims of my mental instability
Rene M. Netherton
am just trying to let anyone know that the posts about me are true and correct.
Rene M Netherton GAL

See more at


What does it take to get a child abuser national attention? Being a female?

In domestic law on May 21, 2011 at 5:58 pm

Again, fatherhood – exhalation. A Fathers Rights to Abuse and to kill.
See Dastardly Dads for more article on KILLER DADS:

Amplify’d from

Could you name 3 parents that’ve killed their own kids? I imagine Susan Smith would come to mind…Casey Anthony is currently in the news… But — can you name any men who’ve killed their kids?

What does it take for a male child abuser (killer) to get national media attention – and a debate on child abuse (or better yet, child protection)? Do you have to be a female?

Here’s an article about a 6’10″ male that THREW a baby and beat him until he died. Hello, national media? This is not an isolated case – many men are in the local news who beat babies, infants, and kids. What the hell does it take to propel them to national news – and consciousness? 

Kirkland-Williams, who is 6-feet-10, was charged on Thursday with first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse. Deputies say he admitted that he attacked the child while angry with Ezekiel’s mother.

She wasn’t in the room when he threw the child, he said. He aimed for the bed, but the baby struck a dresser, he told investigators.

Next, he said, he put the baby in bed on his stomach. Ezekiel would not stop crying, so the boyfriend hit him twice on his back, deputies reported.

Why does beating a baby not warrant national news? This is infuriating.



%d bloggers like this: