The Genocide of Battered Mothers and their Children

Archive for the ‘PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father’ Category

Meet The New Boss…Same As The Old Boss

In : PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, American citizen or Japanese??, American Mothers Political Party DEMANDS: that WE (THE MOTHERS) NO LONGER BE DENIED OUR UNALENABLE RIGHTS, among theses are LIFE, LIBERTY THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS OUR CHILDREN AND THE RIGHT TO PROTECT, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Angry fathers, BAD JUDGES, CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR REPORT 2009-109, CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD CUSTODY BATTLE, CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, CORRUPT CUSTODY EVALUATORS, CORRUPT JUDGES, CORRUPT BASTARDS, CORRUPT PSYCHOLO, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, child abuse, Child Custody, Childrens Rights, corrupt bastards, Corrupt Cops, Behind the Blue Line, Court Appointed Parenting Evaluators and Guardians Ad Litem: Practical Realities and an Argument for Abolition, Court whores for profit, Custody Hell, custody, domestic violence, family court, abusers, government corruption, abused children, bad fathers, misogynists, CPS, protective parent, abusive men, mother rights, family court corruption, violen, domestic law, Domestic Violence on the rise in shawnee county, Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,, Dr Richard Warshak, Dr. Richard Gardner, Father of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Committed Suicide May 25, 2003, family court corruption, Family Court Crisis, Abusers Get Custody, Linda Marie sacks, Mothers day, Washington, DC, American Mothers political party, Million Mom March, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Federally Funded Genocide, Mr. President, Getting screwed by the Family Courts, Getting screwed by the politicians, Jessica Gonzales- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Message to My Child . ., Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, Murder-Suicide, OBAMA, Federal Funded Fatherhood,, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father, Parental Alienation (PAS), Parental Alienation (PAS), Parental Alienation (PAS), Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), Parental Alienation Theory: Amy J. Baker, Court Whore, PAS is a Scam, Speak Out on May 19, 2011 at 11:23 pm

Women tired of being ignored by our President are banding together to bring awareness to the fully funded genocide that is currently raging through America. Pres. Obama has allocated $500 Million in Responsible Fatherhood Initiatives which help abusers gain access and/or custody to children. In 2010. 175 abusive fathers killed their children http://dastardlydads.blogspot.com/2011/02/175-killer-dads-fathers-who-ended-t… fathers who ended their children’s lives in situations involving child custody, visitation, and/or child support (USA)

We are not going to give up, shut up or go away…we are going to get LOUDER!
Disclaimer: I voted for Barack Obama and had every faith in him, We have tirelessly attempted to bring awareness to him about the issues with women in family court and domestic violence. This video intent is to enlighten others on the subject that we women will not get fooled again. We demand that our president stop ignoring our pleas and take action as we can no longer afford to be silent and we won’t. The politicians that are currently waging a war on women we have taken notice of and will not be fooled again.

Are You Ready To Do The WHITE HOUSE Again….And More?

In Abusers Denier, American citizen or Japanese??, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Angry fathers, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, child abuse, Child Custody, Childrens Rights, Court whores for profit, Custody Hell, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, family court corruption, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Federally Funded Genocide, Mr. President, Getting screwed by the Family Courts, Getting screwed by the politicians, Judge Richard Anderson Shawnee County Courts Topeka Kansas, Kansas House Representive Melvin Neufeld . Ks Wefare Summit, Kansas State House, SRS, CPS, Kansas Joint Committee on Children’s Issues on Nov 30, 2009 in Topeka, Kansas Legislature, Covenant Marriages, Domestic Violence, BULLSHIT LAWS, Katie Tagle, Dr. Phill, Steven Garcia, Pinnion Hills, CA,, KS SRS Making money Jailing Children, Lemkau ordered her to turn Baby Wyatt over to his fathe, Maryland Legislature Frank Conway Jr, BATTERER Democrat, District 40, Baltimore City, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Message to My Child . ., Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, Murder-Suicide, OBAMA, Federal Funded Fatherhood,, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father, Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), Parental Alienation Theory: Amy J. Baker, Court Whore, PAS is a Scam, Speak Out on August 18, 2010 at 8:33 pm

by Nancy Carroll at Parenting News Network ™

White House Vigil on Mothers Day, May 9th, 2010

On Mother’s Day 2010, a large crowd of well over 100 concerned citizens wearing Mothers of Lost Children white T-shirts rallied in front of the White House.  After a silent vigil from 11:00 am until noon and a speak out from noon to 1:00 pm that included Mildred Mohammad, former wife of the D.C. Sniper, there was a march down 17th Avenue. Our signs and banners protested the family courts endangerment of 58,000 children per year who must visit or live with their batterers and molesters with no hope of release.

The event was so well received that we will meet again on Friday, October 1st, 2010, the first day of Domestic Violence Awareness Month, in front of the U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001 for a press conference at 11:00 am (pending permits). We will then march about a mile to the Senate buildings and attend prearranged visits with Senators to request that they reschedule the 1994 the Senate Labor and Human Resources Subcommittee Congressional hearing that was postponed. That hearing was designed to address the issues of failures of child protective and family court systems to protect adult and child victims of violence and abuse, statutes of limitations for reporting sexual abuse, and retaliatory targeting of mandated reporters who report child sexual abuse. These problems have grown significantly worse in the past 16 years. We will end our march at the Sewall Belmont House, 144 Constitution Avenue NE, the suffragists’ headquarters a century ago.

We plan to stay at the Hostelling International, 1009 11th Street NW, Washington DC, which we found to be clean and inexpensive. The following day, Saturday, October 2nd, we will rally at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House.

For more information please contact Connie Valentine, 916-233-8381 orcppa001@aol.com.

Justice is biased!! The laws play Russian Roulette with children’s lives.

In : PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, American Mothers Political Party DEMANDS: that WE (THE MOTHERS) NO LONGER BE DENIED OUR UNALENABLE RIGHTS, among theses are LIFE, LIBERTY THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS OUR CHILDREN AND THE RIGHT TO PROTECT, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Angry fathers, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, child abuse, Child Custody, domestic law, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, Dr Richard Warshak, family court corruption, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Judge Richard Anderson Shawnee County Courts Topeka Kansas, Kansas House Representive Melvin Neufeld . Ks Wefare Summit, Kansas State House, SRS, CPS, Kansas Joint Committee on Children’s Issues on Nov 30, 2009 in Topeka, Kansas Legislature, Covenant Marriages, Domestic Violence, BULLSHIT LAWS, KS SRS Making money Jailing Children, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father on July 13, 2010 at 5:35 pm

Justice is biased!! The laws play Russian Roulette with children’s lives.

Yes. Justice is biased against the laws, public attitudes, posturing, perceptions, and family court decisions that pretend mothers and fathers are equivalent, that it’s all gender neutral, that children "need" what shared parenting has to offer, and that the government has any business doing family engineering. See Myths and Facts.

Justice also is biased against the dangerous game of Russian Roulette, even though the great majority of the chambers in that gun are empty.Research "Myths and Facts" pages These pages, and the pages on custody evaluation and the joint custody, contain literally thousands of research citations. The sociological and psychological research on families and child well-being impacts public policy and the issues of child custody in family law. The research frequently is misrepresented, and mis-cited by mental health professionals, lawyers, forensic psychologists and others, as well as interest groups lobbying for laws.

The "facts" on the research myths and facts pages refer to the "fact" of the actual research findings. Often what is cited instead is the "spin" or speculation in researchers’ writeups. These pages are presented as a commentary on the flimsy rationales (of record) given for much of current public policy. Also review the other sections pertaining to the issues impacted by the research, such as child custody, parental alienation theory, and other family law issues, as well as the section on therapeutic jurisprudence, which in the family courts is economic opportunism (not science) under the pretext that engineering family affectional relationships is within the ability of mental health "science" to accomplish (this is misrepresentation), and moreover, that it is an appropriate goal of the government and court system using the specious rationale that these interventions are necessary or helpful for children’s wellbeing (while ignoring the many iatrogenic effects on both families and the over-burdened courts).Also see subsection on Child Custody in FAMILY LAW

  • Critique of Kelly and Lamb Infant Overnight "research" literature by liz CITATIONS TO RESEARCH This paper is used as a teaching illustration of how to do critical reading, and of how the research is distorted and misrepresented in the sociology and psychology literature. It is a line-by-line analysis of propaganda techniques, logic errors, and outright fraud. The Lamb and Kelly article is presented in its entirety, interlineated with discussion and commentary, as well as annotations. The widely-cited paper,Using Child Development Research to Make Appropriate Custody and Access Decisions for Young Children (2000), is an example of pseudo-science posing as objective scholarship by "researchers" or "scientists".But it’s a political position paper advocating (without sound basis for doing so), for joint custody for babies and very young children.

  • Index: LIZNOTES Table of Contents

  • Braver Post-divorce Relocation Study: The real findings by liz

  • Myths and Facts about ADR and Forensic Expertise in Family Court by liz

  • Myths and Facts about Fatherhood and Families by liz CITATIONS TO RESEARCH

  • Myths and Facts about Motherhood and Marriage by liz CITATIONS TO RESEARCH

  • Myths and Facts about Stepmothers and Mother Absence by liz CITATIONS TO RESEARCH

  • Myths and Facts in Wade Horn’s Fatherhood Promotion by liz CITATIONS TO RESEARCH

  • Response to Wade Horn’s "The Importance of Being Father" by liz

  • Myths and Facts about Parenting and Children’s Education by liz CITATIONS TO RESEARCH

  • Statistical myths about child abuse in mother-absent versus father-absent households by liz

  • What the Experts Say: Post-Divorce Parenting and Child Wellbeing by Diane N. Lye DOC SCHOLAR

  • Why People Divorce by liz CITATIONS TO RESEARCH

  • WordPress Tags: Justice,Russian,Roulette,children,gender,government,Myths,Facts,Research,custody,evaluation,citations,policy,health,fact,findings,Often,speculation,commentary,Also,alienation,theory,courts,science,pretext,relationships,misrepresentation,goal,system,rationale,subsection,Child,Critique,Lamb,Infant,literature,paper,illustration,analysis,propaganda,logic,fraud,article,discussion,annotations,Development,Make,Appropriate,Young,example,scholarship,basis,babies,Index,LIZNOTES,Table,Contents,Braver,Post,Relocation,Study,Forensic,Expertise,Court,Marriage,Stepmothers,Mother,Absence,Wade,Horn,Promotion,Response,Importance,Father,Education,Statistical,Divorce,Diane,SCHOLAR,People,attitudes,perceptions,decisions,fathers,chambers,impacts,lawyers,rationales,interventions,techniques,errors,researchers

  • Child Custody Dispute: Man shot his girlfriend and two others: Custody Battle Ends

    In : PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry fathers, Child Custody, corrupt bastards, Court Appointed Parenting Evaluators and Guardians Ad Litem: Practical Realities and an Argument for Abolition, Court whores for profit, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, Dr Richard Warshak, Dr. Richard Gardner, Father of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Committed Suicide May 25, 2003, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father on July 13, 2010 at 1:38 pm

    Gunman kills girlfriend and two others as custody battle ends in tragedy—

    This is NOT a TRAGEDY it is an  OUTRAGE There should have been NO CUSTODY BATTLE – LEAVE THE BABIES WITH THEIR MOTHER!!!!

    A GUNMAN angry about a child custody dispute shot his girlfriend after a confrontation outside her workplace and then killed two of her co-workers before turning the gun on himself.

    Police identified the shooter as Robert Reza, 37.

    Four others were wounded in a rampage that police said was motivated by Reza’s disgust over a domestic dispute involving the girlfriend, who remained hospitalised in critical condition with gunshot wounds on Monday evening.

    It wasn’t known how Reza got past security at the Emcore Corp fibre optics and solar manufacturing plant in Albuquerque, New Mexico, but police said he was a former Emcore employee.

    Police Chief Ray Schultz said investigators recovered a single handgun but it appeared Reza fired 20 to 25 bullets, reloading once.

    Reza went through the building firing shots at several employees and leaving behind a gruesome scene of blood and shell casings across the company headquarters.

    Reza confronted the girlfriend outside the Emcore plant, and his rampage continued inside, Mr Schultz said.

    Mayhem unfolded as Reza opened fire, sending employees fleeing for cover as police locked down the entire neighbourhood.

    It was unknown if the others who were shot had been targeted by Reza, he said.

    "He acted alone," Schultz said.

    "His primary target was his girlfriend at the facility. He knew her routine and confronted her outside the business."

    Mr Schultz initially told reporters six people were dead, but authorities later revised the count to say only three were fatally wounded.

    He said the gunman and his girlfriend had children who live in Rio Rancho and said they were taken into custody by "another agency".

    Mr Schultz said she had told co-workers she planned to report domestic violence to authorities

    Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Stuart Showalter Neo Nazi-Fathers Rights Advocate-Abusers Rights Advocate Glenn Sacks-Abusers Advocate,Right Wing Terrorist- Fathers Rights. Warren Farrell, Mike J Murphy, Jeremy Swanson, Mark K Godbey, Donald Tenn, Stan Rains, Richard A. Gardner coined the term Parental Alienation Syndrome

    WordPress Tags: Child,Custody,Dispute,Battle,Ends,Gunman,tragedy,OUTRAGE,LEAVE,BABIES,MOTHER,confrontation,workplace,workers,Police,shooter,Robert,Reza,Four,gunshot,Corp,Albuquerque,Mexico,employee,Chief,Schultz,handgun,bullets,employees,headquarters,Mayhem,reporters,authorities,children,Rancho,agency,violence,Parental,Alienation,Syndrome,Stuart,Showalter,Nazi,Rights,Advocate,Abusers,Glenn,Terror,Warren,Farrell,Mike,Murphy,Jeremy,Swanson,Mark,Godbey,Donald,Tenn,Stan,Richard,Gardner,Fathers,girlfriend

    Disciplining the Judge

    In : PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, American Mothers Political Party DEMANDS: that WE (THE MOTHERS) NO LONGER BE DENIED OUR UNALENABLE RIGHTS, among theses are LIFE, LIBERTY THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS OUR CHILDREN AND THE RIGHT TO PROTECT, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Angry fathers, child abuse, Court Appointed Parenting Evaluators and Guardians Ad Litem: Practical Realities and an Argument for Abolition, Court whores for profit, Custody Hell, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, Dr Richard Warshak, Dr. Richard Gardner, Father of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Committed Suicide May 25, 2003, family court corruption, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Judge Richard Anderson Shawnee County Courts Topeka Kansas, Katie Tagle, Dr. Phill, Steven Garcia, Pinnion Hills, CA,, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, Murder-Suicide, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father, Parental Alienation (PAS), Parental Alienation (PAS), Parental Alienation (PAS) on July 6, 2010 at 5:27 pm

     

    http://thecrimereport.org/2010/07/05/disciplining-the-judge/#more-43517

    The Crime Report in May told the story of a nine-month old infant murdered in the midst of a bitter California custody battle.  Last month, the presiding judge in the case lost his battle for re-election.

    Could the death of little Wyatt Garcia have been prevented?  Supporters of the boy’s mother, Katie Tagle, have charged that a San Bernardino, CA family court judge who refused to accept her plea for custody was indirectly responsible for the chain of events that ended when her estranged husband shot the boy and then turned the gun on himself last year. (See “Failure to Protect“, The Crime Report, May 26, 2010)

    California Superior Court Judge Robert Lemkau vehemently defended his actions. But last month, local voters came to their own conclusions about his judgment on the bench.

    He lost his position after an election swept him out of office with just 35 percent of the vote, in favor of his opponent, a local deputy assistant district attorney named James Hosking.

    Lemkau had refused to sign a protective order against the boy’s father, 25-year-old Stephen Garcia, even though his ex-girlfriend supplied evidence of Garcia’s threats to harm the boy and herself, including e-mails, text messages and voice messages. Although no extenuating circumstances were raised in court transcripts of the case, Lemkau simply accused Tagle of lying, and ordered that she turn Wyatt over to his father—with fatal results.  “I was treated like a criminal, like a complaining woman,” Tagle told The Crime Report.

    Following the tragedy, the judge expressed some remorse for Wyatt’s death, but refused to acknowledge that he had made a wrong decision instead saying on his re-election Web site, “ I ruled the way I did because there wasn’t enough substantiated evidence to support the request.”

    While it’s unclear whether the election results had any specific relationship to the Wyatt Garcia case, Lemkau’s defeat underscores one of the most difficult issues in U.S. jurisprudence: the difficulty of calling judges to account for their actions  While in theory, elected judges are held accountable to voters, narrowly contested elections are rare in most jurisdictions around the U.S. Few local voters pay attention to such races, and even fewer feel competent to decide on a candidate’s judicial qualifications. .

    At the same time, as an investigation by The Crime Report shows, censuring or recusing a judge through official channels is extremely rare, if not impossible.

    Both Sides Need Judicial Safeguards

    It’s one reason court experts argue that having powerful safeguards in place for judicial protection is extremely important.  Such safeguards are needed not just for the injured parties in a case― but for the judges themselves.

    Disgruntled litigants can file complaints over and over again tying up the judge in an endless process. Furthermore, judges can be unfairly targeted in acrimonious cases when so much is at stake.

    That was the case, for example, in the 2006 shooting of Nevada Family Court Judge Chuck Weller by a man he decided against in a divorce case. The suspect, Darren Mack, shot Weller because he was unhappy with the judge’s rulings, and he later stabbed his wife, Charla Mack, to death.

    “In terms of checks and balances there is (only) the appeal process and the right to ask for a recusal,” said Bill Raftery, Knowledge and Information Services Office Research and Communications Specialist at National Center for State Courts, a national not-for profit that seeks to improve the administration of justice.

    Litigants have few options.  They can try to reverse a decision on appeal, have the judge removed from an ongoing trial with a disqualification motion, move to impeach a judge through the legislative body or file an ethics complaint. However since 1991, only one state judge has been removed through the impeachment process, the American Judicature Society found in 2006. In that year, the latest in which numbers are available, 12 judges were removed from office as a result of state judicial proceedings.

    But while appeals are public record, in many states ethics complaints and recusals for individual judges rates are not available, making it hard for litigants to track a judge’s record.

    And in the murky and chaotic world of family court, where parents can remain locked for years in volatile custody battles over their children, a judge can sometimes mean the difference between life and death.

    If Lemkau had not been up for election in June, it is quite possible he could have remained a sitting judge in family court―leaving the family of baby Wyatt without any recourse―and continuing to render decisions on other custody cases.

    And though it may seem that this case is highly unusual, in the U.S. family court system, sadly, it is not.

    Kids Are The Victims

    Previous articles by The Crime Report found that children are the victims in the contested custody cases that fill the family court dockets. Not only can they be killed, more often than not the children are left in the custody of an abuser who can continue to sexually or physically assault them.

    Another article looked at the systemic issues behind the chaotic and overburdened courtrooms that manage these emotional cases.  The contributing factors include: a dearth of judges caused by budget constraints; parents that represent themselves, thus backlogging the system with procedural mistakes; the explosion of custody disputes in cases with adoptive gay parents; and the high percentage of children born to single parents who are requesting child support. Together these have narrowed the average time a judge spends on a family court case to 3.5 minutes, according to a report by the New York State Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

    The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges with the Office on Violence Against Women started the National Judicial Institute on Domestic Violence over a decade ago to address these problems and train judges to recognize and handle domestic violence. Together these non-profit organizations provided recommendations to judges who hear family court cases on how to recognize high-risk abuse situations.

    Advocates contend that many family court judges are not properly trained or ignore abuse guidelines.  And such judges tend to view protective mothers as not trustworthy and overwrought, making biased decisions on which they have no true recourse, according to Darby Mangen , chapter president of the San Bernardino National Organization of Women (NOW). “No matter how exiguous the case there is no help for the victim,” added Mangen, who was active in the campaign to remove Judge Lemkau.

    Furthermore, since so much of the decision making in custody cases relies on the judge’s discretion, litigants are fearful of bringing any motions against the judge.

    “Family judges have so much power over cases that you can not afford to challenge the judge,” says Tony Tanke, a former senior judicial staff attorney for the Chief  Justice of the California Supreme Court, who advises on family court cases pro-bono.

    Moreover, the often tight relationships between local bar associations and judges make it difficult to find an attorney who wants to take on a complaint against a powerful judge, according to Tanke. Indeed, in the Lemkau v. Hoskings election, Lemkau received endorsements from the local Family Law Bar association and other area attorneys, who supported his decision in baby Wyatt’s case

    The result:  parties who feel victimized by a judge’s biased decision are left with nowhere to turn.

    Appeals Get Nowhere

    Things are further complicated by the appeals process,. A main point of contention in contested custody cases is the judge’s discretion on deciding whether abuse exists and whether it will be allowed into the legal record. If a mother makes an accusation of abuse in a lower court, but the judge dismisses it under their discretion, as happened in the Garcia case, the judgment will not be overturned at the appellate level. Technically, the judges are not doing anything wrong, they are just making a decision based on their evidence.  But that, advocates say, strikes at the heart of the issue.

    In fact, almost always the higher court will defer to lower courts on the question of whether or not an abuse claim is unfounded, leaving an enormous amount of power in the hands of the family court judge.

    These claims are buttressed by a 2008 report, “Fair Courts: Setting Recusal Standards,” issued by Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, a national think tank focusing on justice matters. The authors found, “On appeal, odds of success are even worse. Nearly every appellate court, state and federal, will overturn a lower court’s disqualification or recusal decision only for an “abuse of discretion.”

    Sometimes advocates try to apply some unsubtle pressure, such as attending family court hearings wearing NOW stickers, said Magen.  But there have been more formal attempts to establish a watchdog presence in the courtoom.

    A national court watch project has established pilot programs in five states that involves sending a team of students and volunteers to sit in on family court cases and report any abuses.  So far this year, observers sat in on 560 family court rooms, according to Renee Beeker, Executive Director of National Family Court Watch Project. Although they are still evaluating the watchers’ results, volunteers have found that courtrooms take note of the outside set of eyes on them.

    “The court can change their behavior just because they know people are there,” reports Beeker. “And that is a win for us.”

    Cara Tabachnick is News Editor of The Crime Report

    WordPress Tags: Judge,Crime,Report,infant,midst,California,custody,Last,election,Could,death,Wyatt,Garcia,Supporters,Katie,Tagle,Bernardino,plea,events,husband,Failure,Protect,Superior,Court,Robert,Lemkau,actions,voters,judgment,bench,office,opponent,district,attorney,James,father,Stephen,threats,text,messages,Although,results,woman,tragedy,remorse,decision,relationship,judges,account,theory,attention,candidate,qualifications,investigation,Both,Judicial,protection,cases,example,Nevada,Chuck,Weller,Darren,Mack,wife,Charla,Bill,Raftery,Knowledge,Information,Services,Research,Communications,Specialist,National,Center,State,Courts,administration,justice,Litigants,disqualification,ethics,complaint,impeachment,American,Judicature,numbers,result,proceedings,rates,world,children,difference,life,June,recourse,system,Kids,Victims,Previous,abuser,Another,article,dearth,explosion,percentage,Together,York,Senate,Committee,Judiciary,Council,Juvenile,Violence,Against,Women,Institute,Domestic,problems,guidelines,Darby,Mangen,chapter,president,Organization,victim,discretion,Tony,Tanke,Chief,Supreme,Moreover,relationships,associations,Hoskings,area,Nowhere,contention,accusation,heart,fact,Fair,Recusal,Standards,Brennan,School,tank,odds,Sometimes,Magen,watchdog,team,rooms,Renee,Beeker,Executive,Director,Watch,Project,behavior,reports,Cara,Tabachnick,News,Editor,conclusions,transcripts,elections,jurisdictions,complaints,options,decisions,articles,factors,constraints,organizations,recommendations,situations,endorsements,authors,stickers,students,observers,month,whether,parents,courtrooms,appellate,volunteers

    Submission for the Record: Hearing to Review Responsible Fatherhood Programs

    In Abusers Denier, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Angry fathers, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, child abuse, Child Custody, Childrens Rights, Domestic Violence on the rise in shawnee county, family court corruption, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Kansas House Representive Melvin Neufeld . Ks Wefare Summit, Kansas State House, SRS, CPS, Kansas Joint Committee on Children’s Issues on Nov 30, 2009 in Topeka, Kansas Legislature, Covenant Marriages, Domestic Violence, BULLSHIT LAWS, KS SRS Making money Jailing Children, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, Murder-Suicide, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father on July 1, 2010 at 1:29 pm
    Provide a submission HERE

     

    Ways and Means to Preserve Fatherhood —

    LET THEM KNOW HOW THE FATHERHOOD IS BEING USED TO ABUSE WOMEN AND CHILDREN DEADLINE JULY 1, 2010

    ______________________

    Name: Claudine Dombrowski
    Organization: www.AngelFury.org
    Address: P.O. Box 4974 Topeka, KS 66604 (SaH, ACP)
    Phone: 785-845-3417
    Contact Email: AngelFury@AngelFury.org
    Title of Hearing: Hearing to Review Responsible Fatherhood Programs

    Dear Committee Members:

    Please stop the funding on the fatherhood programs. It denies battered women and children safety and in fact enables abusers to get custody of their victims, paid for by the government.

    The fatherhood program forces these men to be in the lives of people they do not want to be in any way. The mixture is and has been deadly disaster to the lives of literally thousands of mothers and their children.

    See the Leadership Council, Stop Family Violence, and the Civic Research Institute’s “ Domestic Violence, Abuse and Child Custody,” for a more comprehensive and extremely large research and factual studies showing the federally funded ‘genocide’ taking place against mothers and their children- in the name of fatherhood.

    I urge this committee to use common sense in making these appropriations. Sometimes you just can’t fix ‘bad dad’ and sometimes is better that these dangerous persons stay away from innocent and vulnerable children and their mothers.

    Stop the murder of motherhood and a Nation of motherless children.

    PLEASE STOP ALL FUNDING INTO THE FATHERHOOD PROGRAMS!

    www.StopFamilyViolence.org

    http://www.leadershipcouncil.org

    http://www.civicresearchinstitute.com/dvac.html

    WordPress Tags: Submission,Record,Review,Responsible,Provide,HERE,Ways,Means,Preserve,ABUSE,WOMEN,CHILDREN,DEADLINE,______________________,Name,Claudine,Dombrowski,Organization,AngelFury,Topeka,Contact,Email,Title,Dear,Committee,fact,custody,victims,government,forces,mixture,disaster,Leadership,Council,Stop,Violence,Civic,Research,Institute,Domestic,Child,Sometimes,persons,Nation,INTO,StopFamilyViolence,Members

    RESEARCH INDICATING THAT THE MAJORITY OF CASES THAT GO TO COURT AS "HIGH CONFLICT" CONTESTED CUSTODY CASES HAVE A HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

    In : PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, Childrens Rights, family court corruption, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, Murder-Suicide, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father, Speak Out on July 1, 2010 at 1:17 pm

     

    RESEARCH INDICATING THAT THE MAJORITY OF CASES THAT GO TO COURT AS "HIGH CONFLICT" CONTESTED CUSTODY CASES HAVE A HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

    Compiled by Professor Joan S. Meier, Esq.
    George Washington University Law School

    I. Janet Johnston’s publications

    Janet Johnston is best known as a researcher of high conflict divorce and parental alienation. Not a particular friend of domestic violence advocates or perspectives, she has been one of the first to note that domestic violence issues should be seen as the norm, not the exception, in custody litigation.

    Janet R. Johnston et al, "Allegations and Substantiations of Abuse in Custody-Disputing Families," Family Court Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, April 2005, 284-294, p. 284.

    Janet R. Johnston, "High-Conflict Divorce," The Future of Children, Vol. 4, No. 1, Spring 1994, 165-182, p. 167.

    Johnston has noted that approximately 80% of divorce cases are settled, either up front, or as the case moves through the process. Studies have found that only approximately 20% of divorcing or separating families take the case to court. Only approximately 4-5% ultimately go to trial, with most cases settling at some point earlier in the process. (Citing large study by Maccoby and Mnookin, dividing the child: social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press [1992]).

    Johnston cites another study done in California by Depner and colleagues, which found that, among custody litigants referred to mediation, "[p]hysical aggression had occurred between 75% and 70% of the parents . . . even though the couples had been separated. . . [for an average of 30-42 months]". Furthermore, [i]n 35% of the first sample and 48% of the second, [the violence] was denoted as severe and involved battering and threatening to use or using a weapon." -Johnston (1994), supra, citing Depner et al., "Building a uniform statistical reporting system: A snapshot of California Family Court Services," Family and Conciliation Courts Review (1992) 30: 185-206.

    After surveying the research, Johnston concludes:

    "Taken all together these studies suggest that, in divorces marked by ongoing disputes over the custody and care of children, both inside and outside the court, there is often a history of domestic violence in the family and a likelihood that the violence will continue after the separation." – Id. (1994) at p. 169.

    It has previously been observed, based on research which predates the domestic violence/parental alienation battles that are now a feature of the field, that "multiple allegations of abuse are a feature of those higher conflict families" whose cases become contested custody litigation. – Johnston (2005), supra (citing Maccoby and Mnookin (1992).

    II. Peter Jaffe’s compilation of studies

    Peter Jaffe is one of the world’s leading experts on children, domestic violence, and custody.

    – Peter Jaffe, Michelle Zerwer, & Samantha Poisson, (2004),"ACCESS DENIED: The Barriers of Violence and Poverty for Abused Women and their Children After Separation," p. 1.

    In "Access Denied", Jaffe states the following:

    "Myth: Domestic violence is rarely a problem for divorcing couples involved in a child custody dispute."
    Fact: The majority of parents in "high-conflict divorces" involving child custody disputes report a history of domestic violence."

    Jaffe et al also lists the following studies (with the following descriptions) as supporting the position that most custody litigants have had a history of domestic violence:

    • In a review of parents referred for child custody evaluations by the court, domestic violence was raised in 75% of the cases. – Jaffe, P.G. & Austin, G. (1995). The Impact of Witnessing Violence on Children in Custody and Visitation Disputes. Paper presented at the Fourth International Family Violence Research Conference, Durham NH (Rep. No. July 1995)
    • Of 2,500 families entering mediation in CA, approximately three quarters of parents indicated that domestic violence had occurred during the relationship. -Hirst, 2002
    • Between 70-75% of parents referred by the family court for counseling because of failed mediation or continuing disputes over the care of their children, physical aggression had taken place. – Johnston & Campbell, (1988), Impasses of Divorce: The dynamics and resolution of family conflict. New York, NY, US: The Free Press.
    • Attempts to leave a violent partner with children, is one of the most significant factors associated with severe domestic violence and death. – Websdale, N. (1999). Understanding Domestic Homicide. Boston, MA: University Press.
    • A majority of separating parents are able to develop a post-separation parenting plan for their children with minimal intervention of the family court system. However, in 20% of the cases greater intervention was required by lawyers, court-related personnel (such as mediators and evaluators) and judges. In the majority of these cases, which are commonly referred to as "high-conflict," domestic violence is a significant issue. – Johnston, J. R. (1994). "High-conflict divorce." Future of Children, 4, 165-182.

    III. National Center for State Courts

    Studies conducted by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC), looking solely at court records, have found documented evidence of domestic violence in 20-55% of contested custody cases.

    The NCSC’s study, looking only at documented domestic violence in custody court records, found that 24% of court records contained some evidence of domestic violence in Louisville; 27% in Baltimore; and 55% of Las Vegas cases indicated domestic violence. – Susan Keilitz et al, Ðomestic Violence and Child Custody Disputes: A Resource Handbook for Judges and Court Managers, prepared for the National Center for State Courts; State Justice Institute," NCSC Publication Number R- 202, p. 5.

    The same study found that a screening process (utilized by the mediation program) "revealed a much higher incidence of domestic violence than a review of court records alone would have indicated." – Id . at 7.

    IV. Custody Courts Regularly Fail to Note or Lack Information about history of Domestic Violence

    Kernic et al., "Children in the Crossfire: Child Custody Determinations Among Couples With a History of Intimate Partner Violence," Violence Against Women, Vol. 11, No. 8, August 2005, 991-1021, 1013,

    Kernic et al. from the Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center in Seattle, studied at divorce cases, including both those with a documented, substantiated, and/or alleged history of domestic violence, and those without. The study found that in 47.6% of cases with a documented, substantiated history, no mention of the abuse was found in the divorce case files. – Id . at 1005.

    Kernic et al. found that "the court was made aware of less than one fourth of those cases with a substantiated history of intimate partner violence." – Id. at 1016.

    Further, Kernic et al. found that fathers with a history of committing abuse were denied child visitation in only 17% of cases. Mothers in these cases were no more likely to obtain custody than mothers in non-abuse cases. This study found that mothers were "more likely" than fathers to be awarded sole custody, but does not identify what proportion of cases resulted in equal sharing of physical custody (which is available in Washington even when one parent is designated "primary"). – Id. at 1014-1015.

    The Virginia Commission on Domestic Violence Prevention commissioned a study of these issues at University of Virginia in 1997-98. The study found that in custody cases where there was also a domestic abuse case in court, only 25% of the custody files referenced the existence of the domestic abuse case. – www.courts.state.va.us/fvp/history.html

    ATTACHMENT

    Doreen Ludwig’s comments in response to Pennsylvania plan to increase funding of Counselors, Parenting Coordinators, etc. using HHS OSCE and TANF funds.

    March 3, 2009 Presentation to Senate Judiciary Chairman in response to Proposed Changes to Child Custody Law.    Doreen Ludwig, PO Box 13778 , Reading PA 19612 , #610-939=1354

    I contacted Mr. Warner because I have documented a lack of due process in child custody, especially in cases involving abuse.  Custody decisions are made not by Judges, but by Psychologists who call themselves evaluators.  The custody evaluator does NOT adhere to law or Rules of Evidence.  They do not investigate or verify false allegations.  They often rely solely on hypothetical tests and do not question collateral witnesses such as the children’s school, doctors, family, friends, or police reports.  They have no training or hands-on experience in abuse and control.  They have a profit motive and they are giving custody to abusers to continue cases and award themselves perpetual counseling fees which tend to be higher than the market average.

    NO REMEDY FOR AN UNETHICAL, PERJURIOUS CUSTODY EVALUATION 

    THERE IS NO REMEDY FOR AN UNETHICAL, PERJURIOUS CUSTODY EVALUATION  THAT DOES NOT PROTECT VICTIMS OF ABUSE!!!!  See Dr. Ring’s report stating “abuse was mutual.” 

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court DENIES appeals, against the PA Constitution, in order to permit custody to be determined solely on the basis of the custody evaluation, even when it is proven to be written for one parent only.  Likewise, Court Administration DENIES that custody evaluators are submitting fictitious reports.  The Rules Committee refuses to hold evaluators to any standard.

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Committee has refused to write standards for custody evaluations.  Reports are submitted as evidence WITHOUT cross-examination. Witnesses and exhibits that disagree with statements contained in the custody evaluation are DENIED or ignored.  Reports are not held to the legal standard of Frye Hearings to determine their admissibility.  Reports do not even address the Best Interests of the Children.  Judges abdicate responsibility to the evaluator.

    BIAS REPORT PROVES BREAKDOWN

    The “FINAL REPORT OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON RACIAL AND GENDER BIAS IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 1999-2003” proves a severe breakdown in protection from abuse in issues of family law.   The Bias Report failed to adequately address domestic violence in custody, support and divorce. 

    The Bias Report failed to document results of contested custody including use of evaluations.

    Page 474 – Custody – County Surveys – None of the counties responded to a survey question concerning the percentage of fathers who were awarded primary physical custody in contested custody actions, nor did any respond to the survey’s request for breakdowns by race and gender of the outcome of plaintiffs’ requests for physical custody for 2000–01.

    Judges responsibility -  It is the family court responsibility to facilitate fair, and equitable litigation.  One party shall not maintain sole control of marital assets during pendency of custody litigation.  Parity and equal access to the law is in the best interests of the children.  An interim disbursement may be needed to obtain parity and equal access to the law.  The Bias Report states “The courts rarely grant advance distributions of marital assets. Because most non-consensual divorce cases take more than two years for assets to be distributed, the court’s reluctance to enter interim awards places a burden on the economically dependent spouse and may inhibit his or her full access to the legal system. The spouse controlling the marital estate may also dissipate the assets, leaving no recourse for the dependent spouse.”  “At public hearings throughout Pennsylvania, attorneys and litigants testified that the judicial system often provides little or no help to pro se litigants who are either initiating legal proceedings or responding to actions against them.[i]

    TRADE ASSOCIATIONS MAXIMIZE PROFIT

    Since 1999, when the task force developed SB 74, Trade Associations have increased their influence within family court.  Trade Association members include Judges, Court Administrators, lawyers and custody evaluators.  Trade Associations facilitate networking between members, teaching Judges, administrators, lawyers and custody evaluators how to work together for maximum business profit potential. 

    Proposed 5332, 5334, 5335, 5339 and 5340 would help trade association, for-profit motivated, members increase business by court appointment and orders for fees.  There are NO limits on fees and NO ethical requirements for practitioners, and NO system for review.  In fact, the proposed 5340 protects unethical custody evaluators!!!  See Dr. Ring charges.

    There is already court approval of bankruptcy due to litigation.  See Berks County Court Administrator letter.  Proposed 5332, 5334, 5335, 5339 and 5340 will increase bankruptcy.  There is no protection for equal access to funds for defense.  Abusers are more likely to control finances.  Legal aide and pro bono representation is NOT available for victims of abuse.

    Abusers are more likely to seek custody and to take the abuse to court.  See Working Paper, page 91-93, Exhibit K, “Research Indicating That The Majority Of Cases That Go To Court As "High Conflict" Contested Custody Cases Have A History Of Domestic Violence” compiled by Professor Joan S. Meier, Esq., George Washington University Law School . 

    Bias Report at Page 402 – While some courts are all too willing to challenge the domestic abuse survivor’s motivations for filing a PFA petition, they often fail to question the abuser’s motive for requesting substantial custody. Research indicates that custody disputes are more frequent when there is a history of domestic violence. Moreover, fathers who are batterers are twice as likely to seek sole custody of their children.62 Such requests for substantial custody may be a misuse of the legal system, motivated by the batterer’s continuing need to control and abuse the mother through harassment and retaliatory legal action. Fathers in such cases may use children as an excuse to have contact with the women they are otherwise prohibited from seeing. Yet, if mothers seek to protect themselves and their children by moving frequently or seeking to limit the father’s contact, the courts may view the mothers as unstable, uncooperative, and unwilling to share access to their children, all in contravention of Pennsylvania’s Custody Act.

    Unfortunately for children, the trade association has found abuse and extended litigation good for business!!!  The trade association is NOT motivated by The Best Interests of the Children.  The members are motivated by self-interest of profit!

    STATE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION

    The trade association’s minimize abuse and control.  They prefer to give victims equal accountability for the abuse, often dismissing abuse as high conflict or alienation. 

    This unequal treatment sends a message that the mother is more responsible for getting help and is more “sick” for being in an abusive relationship than the actual person who committed the violence. As part of their mental abuse, many fathers will tell a woman that if she seeks help to escape the home, the system will turn against her, that she will be blamed for the break up of the family, that she will lose everything and that the abuser will get away with everything because he is in control – the system often perpetuates this belief and reinforces to women that they are powerless and will be punished, no matter what they do. Id. In re Sharline Nicholson, et al., 00-CV-2229 (JBW) (CLP), US Eastern District New York  3/1/2002

    The “Nicholson” Opinion was written after abused mothers sued New York Children and Youth for failure to protect victims of abuse.  The Honorable Justice Weinstein addresses Government’s responsibility to victims: 

    Responsibility for governmental protection of children rests primarily on the state or municipality. See, e.g. Lois A. Weithorn, Protecting Children from Exposure to Domestic Violence: The Use and Abuse of Child Maltreatment Statutes, 53 Hast. L. J. 1, 19-26 (2001).

    In a heterogeneous, non-theocratic and democratic society such as ours, there is enormous diversity in domestic relationships and in the degree that they are founded on mutual respect and love (the norm) or malevolence. Particularly if there is a sexual relationship between the adults, the emotional interaction may be intense, sometimes flaring into psychological or even physical abuse. The abuse may be endemic. It may be directed against the children as well as the mother. The children may be indirectly affected, as when they observe an abusive incident. Even when the abuse is not physical, it may be so fierce as to be the equivalent of a beating. The mother may lack the ability or resources to either protect herself or the children. Economic, emotional, moral or other ties may, as a practical matter, prevent the mother from separating from the abuser or seeking governmental protection against him. She may hope for eventual reconciliation – and sometimes it does occur.

    Myriad subtle reasons may prevent her from separating from the abuser, protecting the children, or seeking assistance. In some households ethnic or social mores are relied upon to justify abuse as a “traditional right.” Ability to deal with tensions induced by self, a partner, children, economic and social factors varies enormously among those who become embroiled in domestic violence. In short, this case presents the most intricate and recondite relationships, the stuff of thousands of novels, poems, newspaper accounts, and legal proceedings.

    Whatever the explanation, physical abuse of mothers and children, or the imminent threat of such ill treatment is not tolerated in our American society. Whether the mother, the family, or the immediate social group accepts cruelty as the norm or as permitted, it is a minimum assumption of our twenty-first century United States that it will not be tolerated.  The Government has the obligation to stop it and prevent its recurrence whenever it can.

    Second, battered women often suffer from behavioral and psychological problems that differentiate them quite sharply from non-battered women. Third, the behavior of social workers and health service providers was a direct, albeit inadvertent, contributor to women’s sense of being trapped in abusive relationships. Tr.1540.  The most dangerous time for a woman and a child appears to be immediately after she leaves the batterer; his threats will usually make her aware of this. Ex. 106 at 16.  The battered woman cannot change or stop the perpetrator’s violence by herself. If she does not have adequate support, resources, and protection, leaving him may simply make it worse for the children.” Id. at 19.

    PSYCHOLOGISTS/EVALUATORS DON’T ACT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF CHILDREN

    An influential trade association is the Association of Family Conciliation Courts (AFCC).  This group began in California and has developed to a National organization with extreme influence over family courts.  This group does NOT advocate for victims of abuse.  It does NOT advocate for safety of children.  It advocates for Fathers Rights often by a presumption of shared custody even when the Father is abusive, ranging from physical abuse, verbal and psychological abuse to sexual abuse (looking, touching, to penetration).  Because of the advocacy for abusers, AFCC disseminates legal strategies for abusers to obtain custody.  Legal strategies that proliferate in family court include:

    ·       Making false allegations of mental illness, drug abuse,

    ·       Makings claims of alienation or unwillingness to foster a positive abuser/child relationship

    Lawyers can obtain a custody evaluator who will write a report awarding custody to the abuser.  Lawyers are coached to have pre-arranged agreement with Judges to let the custody evaluator run the case.  See Dr. Bricklin’s  “SEVERE PARENTAL ALIENATION AND SIMILAR ESTRANGEMENT PATTERNS: OUTPATIENT THERAPEUTIC PROTOCOLS”  Exhibit J, page 82-90 of working paper, proving advocating pre-agreements for judicial orders to administer Threat Therapy to child abuse victims.  These pre-agreements with Judges are common.  All PACE custody evaluators are certified only after submitting a letter from a Judge.  It should be noted that Dr. Barry Bricklin advocates for pedophiles and treatment of children by Threat Therapy.  Dr. Bricklin’s wife is the President of the Pennsylvania Psychological Board.  In Berks County the PACE evaluator is Dr. Timothy Ring.  Charges against Dr. Ring and the transcript of 3/27/06 prove that Dr. Ring was used to award custody to Father, an abuser. 

    Even if a parent has a (mildly) “negative” style, a child who interacts with this parent has the opportunity to learn how to deal with it, increasing that child’s available coping and resource-styles throughout life.

    Not only must a MHP deal with all of the diagnostic complexities already mentioned, but also with the fact that psychological life is transformational: it is a “work in continual progress.”  A parent who was previously a poor psychological match for a particular child can therapeutically upgrade and transform his or her styles and become a good match for the child. A maturing child may come to see aspects of value in a given parent’s behavior that were initially not perceived by the child, or were perhaps not even in existence prior to the child’s changing his or her own patterns which then could induce change in the parent.  All relationships are continuously interactive and potentially transformative for each member of any given family system.

    Hence the best (and probably only) way to ascertain if an alienated or estranged child could profit from an ongoing relation with a “target” parent is to set up the special kind of therapeutic program that has a chance of being successful in such cases and observing what happens.  Once the program is in place one can carefully monitor the therapeutic process for positive and negative prognostic signs.  We rarely mention these emergent signs (signs that usually do not yet exist at the outset of treatment) because some can be “faked” (while others cannot be faked).  In other words, we rarely, at the outset, tell the main therapeutic participants all of the things we are paying attention to.

    A therapeutic plan that can be successful in these cases is very different than traditional plans.  For one thing, the Court must be actively involved in the process (specific details are listed later).  For another, the child must rapidly see that he or she is NOT going to be the major (or even minor) decision-maker of importance as to who attends the therapeutic sessions or for how long.  This “tail-wagging-the-dog” phenomenon in which a child gets to exercise control over parents will ultimately not only ensure that an out-patient reunification process fails, but is also ultimately harmful to the child as he or she grows up.

    Conservative foundations investments paid off handsomely in 1996, as their grantees were deeply involved in drafting the new welfare legislation. Debate centered on correcting perceived defects in the nation’s welfare system, rather than designing a strategy to reduce child poverty or increase family income. Ending the features of the system that were perceived as encouraging dependency and family instability was stressed more than creating affirmative policies to improve the economic well-being of American’s low-income families. To the extent that enhanced well-being was considered, it was assumed to flow directly from reductions in dependency and non-marital births. The Republican’s Congressional victory in 1994, and the perceived endorsements of the GOP Contract with America – reinforced the conservative message.[1]

    WordPress Tags: RESEARCH,CASES,COURT,HIGH,CONFLICT,CUSTODY,HISTORY,DOMESTIC,VIOLENCE,Professor,Joan,Meier,George,Washington,School,Janet,Johnston,researcher,alienation,friend,norm,exception,litigation,Substantiations,Abuse,Review,April,Divorce,Future,Children,Maccoby,Mnookin,Cambridge,Harvard,California,Depner,colleagues,mediation,aggression,weapon,system,snapshot,Services,Conciliation,Courts,Taken,separation,Peter,Jaffe,compilation,world,Michelle,Zerwer,Samantha,Poisson,Women,Myth,Fact,descriptions,Austin,Impact,Visitation,Paper,Fourth,International,Conference,Durham,relationship,Hirst,Campbell,York,Free,death,Websdale,Homicide,Boston,intervention,personnel,mediators,judges,National,Center,State,NCSC,records,Louisville,Vegas,Susan,Keilitz,Ðomestic,Child,Resource,Handbook,Justice,Institute,Publication,Number,incidence,Fail,Note,Lack,Information,Kernic,Crossfire,Determinations,Among,Intimate,Partner,Against,August,Harborview,Injury,Prevention,Seattle,files,Further,proportion,parent,Virginia,Commission,existence,ATTACHMENT,Ludwig,comments,response,Pennsylvania,Coordinators,OSCE,TANF,March,Presentation,Senate,Judiciary,Chairman,Warner,Psychologists,evaluator,Rules,Evidence,collateral,doctors,friends,reports,motive,fees,REMEDY,UNETHICAL,PERJURIOUS,EVALUATION,PROTECT,VICTIMS,Supreme,Constitution,basis,Likewise,Administration,Committee,examination,Frye,Best,Interests,BIAS,REPORT,BREAKDOWN,FINAL,RACIAL,GENDER,protection,results,Page,percentage,actions,outcome,requests,disbursement,reluctance,places,spouse,estate,recourse,proceedings,TRADE,ASSOCIATIONS,MAXIMIZE,PROFIT,task,Association,appointment,orders,requirements,approval,bankruptcy,Berks,Administrator,letter,defense,Abusers,Legal,aide,representation,Exhibit,abuser,Moreover,harassment,action,father,contravention,self,RESPONSIBLE,treatment,message,person,woman,belief,Sharline,Nicholson,Eastern,District,Opinion,Youth,failure,Honorable,Weinstein,Government,Lois,Weithorn,Exposure,Maltreatment,Hast,relationships,degree,malevolence,interaction,incident,Economic,reconciliation,Myriad,assistance,mores,poems,newspaper,explanation,threat,American,Whether,assumption,obligation,recurrence,Second,problems,Third,behavior,workers,health,contributor,threats,perpetrator,EVALUATORS,AFCC,organization,Rights,presumption,penetration,advocacy,drug,Makings,agreement,Bricklin,SEVERE,PARENTAL,SIMILAR,ESTRANGEMENT,OUTPATIENT,THERAPEUTIC,Therapy,PACE,Judge,Barry,wife,President,Psychological,Board,Timothy,transcript,life,member,relation,Once,signs,outset,words,attention,plans,decision,maker,importance,phenomenon,Conservative,foundations,investments,welfare,Debate,nation,strategy,income,features,dependency,extent,Republican,Congressional,victory,Contract,America,publications,Allegations,dilemmas,Barriers,evaluations,Impasses,factors,lawyers,Managers,fathers,Counselors,decisions,statements,members,Administrators,motivations,Statutes,tensions,providers,strategies,PROTOCOLS,agreements,aspects,participants,sessions,policies,reductions,endorsements,litigants,parents,supra,batterer,sexual,herself

    ACTION ALERT: Ways and Means to Preserve Fatherhood — Reply Today! LET THEM KNOW HOW THE FATHERHOOD IS BEING USED TO ABUSE WOMEN AND CHILDREN DEADLINE JULY 1, 2010

    In : PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, American citizen or Japanese??, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Angry fathers, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, child abuse, Child Custody, Childrens Rights, corrupt bastards, Court Appointed Parenting Evaluators and Guardians Ad Litem: Practical Realities and an Argument for Abolition, Court whores for profit, Custody Hell, domestic law, Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, Dr Richard Warshak, Dr. Richard Gardner, Father of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Committed Suicide May 25, 2003, family court corruption, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Kansas House Representive Melvin Neufeld . Ks Wefare Summit, Kansas State House, SRS, CPS, Kansas Joint Committee on Children’s Issues on Nov 30, 2009 in Topeka, Kansas Legislature, Covenant Marriages, Domestic Violence, BULLSHIT LAWS, KS SRS Making money Jailing Children, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, Murder-Suicide, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father on June 30, 2010 at 5:49 pm

     

    Let’sGetHonestBlog

    {{again, “noncustodial parents” are increasingly WOMEN, but is code for “FATHERs.”}}

    Provide a submission HERE

    _____________

    The last post was leading into this one, as I mentioned “Fatherhood” and then posted a reply to a review of the latest book by a woman who fled Islam to the Netherlands, then to the United States, and who I’ve mentioned on my blog before (Ayaan Hirsi Ali).  I have not gone through anything like — well in quality — her life experience, but am going through similar re-evaluation (ongoing) of my allegiance to the monotheistic religion I have all my life felt represented the truth, beauty, and transcendence I knew as a child in Nature, and as an adolescent in art, and which I felt personally coherent in attributing to “God.”

    TODAY — pros and cons, submit your “testimony” in print.  Is the pie in the sky going to stop the constant drainage of blood, sorrow, rape, kidnapping, degradation of humanity, bitterness, and other features of the supposed “human condition” beginning in sin til redeemed by bloodshed or repentance to acknowledging one’s sin, one way or another?? 

    Here’s the FEDERAL discussion of “FATHERHOOD” — again, find a woman present in the witnesses or panelists, if you can:
    June 17, 2010

    Hearing to Review Responsible Fatherhood Programs
    B-318 Rayburn House Office Building – beginning at 10:00 AM
    (June 17th, 2010)

    FOCUS OF THE HEARING: 
    The hearing will [did] focus on the effectiveness of Responsible Fatherhood Programs in improving the relationship between non-custodial parents and their children, as well as their ability to provide financial support.  \

    {{again, “noncustodial parents” are increasingly WOMEN, but is code for “FATHERs.”}}

    Provide a submission HERE

    Find a female on the Panelists, either Panel 1 or Panel 2. 

    Remember, this is an off-shoot of 1994 & 1995 (Clinton era, folks!), 1998 & 1999 male offence that children wake up in homes without fathers in them.  Particularly African-American children, what else is new. 

    I cannot blog completely (time, and personal issues), but commend to us today, more “fathers” that got their kids back. 

    THIS one (Father tries to sell baby for $25, is beaten by inmates, etc.) shows a man with a domestic violence background (not to mention drug, not to mention, his 6 yr old removed from his home.  No problem, he finds another woman through a drug deal, impregnates HER (age difference, 18 years) and they BOTh try to sell their offspring.  Notably, the 6 yr old who was removed was the son of his ex-wife, against whom he committed domestic violence.  SOMEHOW, though that child (after jail for DV?) ended up in HIS household, or his Mommy & Daddy’s.. 

    Man accused of trying to sell baby beaten in jail

    Jun 28, 2010 Inmates beat dad in baby-for-sale case (AP) – Jail officials in California say afather accused of trying to sell his baby for $25
    http://www.wane.com/…/man-accused-of-trying-to-sell-baby-beaten-in-jail-ob10-jgr_34582168 hours ago

    Faustek/Tomasini

    Even inmates get outraged at THAT>

    Here’s another enraged stepfather, Schlager.  This one, good luck disentangling father, stepfather, stepdaughter — and where’s BIOLOGICAL MOM?

    Gunman had criminal past

    Jun 22, 2010 Article:Gunman had criminal past:/c/a/2010/06/22/BA2C1E3A7H. Police said Schlager hadan extensive

    Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Stuart Showalter Neo Nazi-Fathers Rights Advocate-Abusers Rights Advocate Glenn Sacks-Abusers Advocate,Right Wing Terrorist- Fathers Rights. Warren Farrell, Mike J Murphy, Jeremy Swanson, Mark K Godbey, Donald Tenn, Stan Rains, Richard A. Gardner coined the term Parental Alienation Syndrome

    WordPress Tags: ACTION,ALERT,Ways,Means,Preserve,ABUSE,WOMEN,CHILDREN,DEADLINE,LetGetHonestBlog,Private,Matter,System,woman,Islam,Netherlands,Ayaan,Hirsi,life,evaluation,allegiance,religion,truth,Nature,testimony,degradation,features,human,repentance,Here,FEDERAL,discussion,June,Review,Responsible,Rayburn,House,Office,FOCUS,relationship,code,Provide,submission,Find,Panelists,Panel,Remember,Clinton,folks,male,African,American,kids,Father,violence,background,drug,difference,BOTh,wife,Mommy,Daddy,sale,Jail,California,Faustek,Tomasini,Schlager,luck,BIOLOGICAL,Gunman,Article,Police,FATHERs,inmates,blog,parents,stepfather

    (KS) HAL RICHARDSON-CRIMINAL PARENTAL INTERFERNCE, CONTEMPT, CRIMINAL CUSTODIAL INTERFERNCE, ABUSE, KIDNAPPING, HOSTAGE-and gets away with it!

    In : PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Angry fathers, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, child abuse, Child Custody, corrupt bastards, Court Appointed Parenting Evaluators and Guardians Ad Litem: Practical Realities and an Argument for Abolition, Court whores for profit, Custody Hell, Domestic Violence on the rise in shawnee county, Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,Domestic Violence,, don hoffman jill dykes judge david debenham Dr. rodeheffer, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, Dr Richard Warshak, Dr. Richard Gardner, Father of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Committed Suicide May 25, 2003, family court corruption, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Getting screwed by the Family Courts, Getting screwed by the politicians, Judge Richard Anderson Shawnee County Courts Topeka Kansas, Kansas House Representive Melvin Neufeld . Ks Wefare Summit, Kansas State House, SRS, CPS, Kansas Joint Committee on Children’s Issues on Nov 30, 2009 in Topeka, Kansas Legislature, Covenant Marriages, Domestic Violence, BULLSHIT LAWS, KS SRS Making money Jailing Children, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, Murder-Suicide, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father, Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), PAS is a Scam, Speak Out, Susan Murphy Milano, Times Up, Defending Our Lives, on June 30, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    I am STILL waiting for a hearing date to advance this… well I have been waiting 15 years for any justice—and I guess we will still wait longer. Now, IF I put the tribute Video of my dead mother and daughter up—I’d be in court in two days—( past experience)

    AND, IN CONTEMPT AGAIN for —the powerful LOVE that is shown between three generations in that TRIBUTE VIDEO, LOVE HOPE & EMPOWERMENT

    Recall they did not allow child to even attend her Grandmothers funeral. (re-listening as I hyperlinked to this-UNREAL brings me back down to the reality of the genocide)

    But, I was found in Contempt. Daddy dearest as we all know—can beat the shit out of his daughters mother through out the years—and they call it as “MOM is not ‘co-parenting’. WTF"?

    Yes this IS Justice. Raped, Blind folded gagged and rolled in the mud- then the gang bang begins again.

    Welcome to mandatory shared parenting, and the abusers right lobby (aka fathers Rights, Parental Alienation, PAS whatever oppressive coined term of the day) to continue to abuse.

    Welcome to the Fathers Rights Movement.

    Welcome to hell.

    American Mothers Political Party: coming soon:  www.AmericanMothersPoliticalParty.org

    and-We Will Be Victorious

    So Halleck G Richardson II, Owner of Minuteman Solar Film Topeka, Kansas. Your Reign of Terror can not last forever-

    When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall––think of it–always. –Mahatma Gandhi

    That–and Karma IS a bitch. The Universal Justice.

     

    01/29/2010 MISC. Petitioner in person and by Jason Hoffman. Respondent in person and by Robert E. Duncan, II. G.A.L., Jill Dykes, present. Court Reporter: Digital Div. 13. Motion #88 to find Respondent in Contempt and Motion #87 by Respondent to Modify Visitation before Court.

    Evidence presented – Court finds Petitioner has failed to prove an intentional violation of Court’s prior orders by Respondent and denies motion to find Respondent in contempt.

    Court finds minor child has serious concerns about parenting time with mother but they do not rise to the level that would seriously endanger child’s physical, mental, moral or emotional health per K.S.A. 60-1616(a). Further, reasons for ordering supervised parenting time in 2004 were not presented in the evidence, minor child is 15 now and it is in best interest of child that both parents have relationship with child.

    Court orders unsupervised parenting time from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. every Sunday, starting January 31, 2010 – exchanges at LEC, parenting time to be exercised in public within boundary of Shawnee County, Kansas. Neither parent to discuss divorce, proceedings or other parent with child. Respondent allowed to call daughter every Tuesday and Thursday between 8:00 p.m and 9:00 p.m. for 1/2 hour. Respondent to pay her remaining balance at Odyssey. Court will review case on March 2, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. to determine if parenting time should be expanded. Duncan to do JE. DBD

    Soooo what has happened?? Ya think any part of this Order was followed? nope, custody hell in Kansas continues (Coercive Control)

    DIRECT VIOLATIONS OF THE COURTS ORDER JANUARY 29TH, 2010

    CRIMINAL PARENTAL INTERFERNCE, CONTEMPT, CRIMINAL CUSTODIAL INTERFERNCE, ABUSE, KIDNAPPING AND HOSTAGE

    1. February 2nd, 2010 Tuesday 8:15 PM- CALL DENIED.

    2. February 3rd, 2010 Wednesday- 7:39 PM- CALL DENIED.

    3. February 4th, 2010 Thursday- 8:30 PM –CALL DENIED.

    4. February 9th, 2010 Tuesday 8:00 PM -CALL DENIED.

    5. February 16th 2009 Tuesday 8:30 PM –CALL DENIED.

    6. February 18th, 2010 8:00 PM- CALL DENIED.

    7. February 21st, 2010 12:20 PM VISIT CANCELLED.

    8. February 23rd, 2010 Tuesday 8:30 pm- CALL DENIED.

    9. March 2, 2010 Tuesday 8:30 pm –CALL DENIED.

    10. March 4th, 2010 Thursday 8:29 PM- CALL DENIED.

    11. March 9th 2010 Tuesday 8:45 PM-CALL DENIED.

    12. March 11, 2010 Thursday 8: 50 PM-CALL DENIED.

    13. March 16th, 2010 Tuesday 8:05 PM- CALL DENIED.

    14. March 18th, 2010 Thursday 8:27 PM-CALL DENIED.

    15. March 23rd, 2010 Tuesday 8:35 PM-CALL DENIED.

    16. March 25th, 2010 Thursday 8:15 PM- CALL DENIED.

    17. March 30th, 2010 Tuesday 8:05 PM-CALL DENIED.

    18. April 1st, 2010 Thursday 2010 8:15 PM –CALL DENIED.

    19. April 6th, 2010 Tuesday, 8:10 PM-CALL DENIED.

    20. April 8th, 2010 Thursday 8:25 PM-CALL DENIED.

    21. April 15th, 2010 Thursday 8:37 PM –CALL DENIED.

    22. April 20th, 2010 Tuesday 8:25 PM-CALL DENIED.

    23. April 22nd, 2010 Thursday 8:18 PM-CALL DENIED.

    24. April 27TH, 2010 Tuesday 8:25 PM-CALL DENIED.

    25. April 29th, 2010 Thursday 7:55 PM-CALL DENIED.

    26. May 4th, 2010 Tuesday 8:30 PM-CALL DENIED.

    27. May 6th, 2010 Wednesday 8:27 PM-CALL DENIED.

    28. May 9th, 2010 Sunday Visit- Mothers dayVISIT LATE BY TEN MINUTES

    29. May 13th, 2010 Thursday 8:05 PM –CALL DENIED

    30. May 16TH, 2010 Sunday Visit-VISIT LATE NINE MINUTES

    31. May 18th, 2010 Tuesday 8:07 PM-CALL DENIED

    32. May 20th, 2010 Thursday 8:20 PM -CALL DENIED.

    33. May 23rd, 2010 Sunday- VISIT CANCELLED.

    34. May 25th, 2010 Tuesday-8:15 pm -CALL DENIED.

    35. May 27th, 2010 Thursday- 8:28 CALL DENIED.

    36. May 30th, 2010 Sunday Visit –VISIT LATE BY TWENTY MINUTES.

    37. June 1, 2010 Tuesday 8:20PM-CALL DENIED.

    38. June 3, 2010 Thursday 8:00 PM –CALL DENIED

    39. June 6, 2010 Sunday Visit-1:15 PM VISIT LATE BY FIFTEEN MINUTES.

    40. June 8, 2010 Tuesday 8:05 PM-CALL DENIED

    41. June 10, 2010 Thursday 8:25 PM-CALL DENIED

    42. June 13, 2010 Sunday 1:00 PM –VISIT CANCELLED.

    43. June 15th, 2010 Tuesday 8:20 PM= CALL DENIED.

    44. June 17th, 2010 Thursday 8:15 PM – CALL DENIED.

    45. June 20th, 2010 SUNDAY VISIT- NO SHOW- NO CALL

    46. June 22nd, 2010 TUESDAY 8:00 PM –CALL DENIED

    47. June 24th, 20100 Thursday 8:15 PM-CALL DENIED

    48. June 27th, 2010 SUNDAY 1:00 PM VISIT- DENIED

    49. June 29th, 2010 Tuesday -8:10 PM- CALL DENIED

    Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Stuart Showalter Neo Nazi-Fathers Rights Advocate-Abusers Rights Advocate Glenn Sacks-Abusers Advocate,Right Wing Terrorist- Fathers Rights. Warren Farrell, Mike J Murphy, Jeremy Swanson, Mark K Godbey, Donald Tenn, Stan Rains, Richard A. Gardner coined the term Parental Alienation Syndrome

    WordPress Tags: RICHARDSON,CRIMINAL,PARENTAL,INTERFERNCE,CONTEMPT,CUSTODIAL,ABUSE,HOSTAGE,STILL,justice,tribute,Video,daughter,AGAIN,LOVE,HOPE,EMPOWERMENT,Recall,Grandmothers,funeral,UNREAL,Daddy,dearest,Blind,gang,Welcome,Rights,Alienation,Movement,hell,American,Political,Victorious,Halleck,Owner,Minuteman,Solar,Film,Topeka,Kansas,Reign,Terror,history,truth,Mahatma,Gandhi,Karma,Universal,MISC,Petitioner,person,Jason,Hoffman,Respondent,Robert,Duncan,Jill,Dykes,Court,Reporter,Digital,Motion,Modify,Visitation,Evidence,violation,orders,health,Further,relationship,January,boundary,Shawnee,Neither,parent,proceedings,Odyssey,March,Soooo,Order,custody,Coercive,Control,DIRECT,COURTS,February,CALL,VISIT,April,LATE,MINUTES,NINE,June,Syndrome,Stuart,Showalter,Nazi,Advocate,Abusers,Glenn,Warren,Farrell,Mike,Murphy,Jeremy,Swanson,Mark,Godbey,Donald,Tenn,Stan,Richard,Gardner,generations,fathers,tyrants,murderers,VIOLATIONS

    Neanderthals: Did they really die off?

    In : PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, AMPP-American Mothers Political Party, Australian Mothers Political Party, Angry fathers, Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Breaking The Silence; Children's Stories, child abuse, Child Custody, Court Appointed Parenting Evaluators and Guardians Ad Litem: Practical Realities and an Argument for Abolition, don hoffman jill dykes judge david debenham Dr. rodeheffer, Don Hoffman, family court corruption, Judge David Debenham, M. Jill Dykes, misogynists, mother rights, parental alienation, protective parent, Rape, restraining orders, woman haters. Jason P Hoffman,, Dr Richard Warshak, Dr. Richard Gardner, Father of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Committed Suicide May 25, 2003, family court corruption, Fathers & Families, Glenn Sacks, ACFC, RADAR, ANCPR, fathers murdering, Fathers Rights, Judge Richard Anderson Shawnee County Courts Topeka Kansas, Maternal Deprivation, Domestic Violence By Proxy, Motherhood, Motherless America, Mothers Rights, Murder-Suicide, PAAO, Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Parental Alienation Awareness Organization, Abusers Denier, Angry father, Parental Alienation (PAS), Parental Alienation (PAS), Parental Alienation (PAS), Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), Parental Alienation Theory: Amy J. Baker, Court Whore, PAS is a Scam, Speak Out on June 26, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    anonymumsnews

    Whilst scientists are debating over the time of their death and what they died of, a mens rights crusader has nearly won a lawsuit against the Oakland A over not giving him a mothers day hat. The judge has approved a settlement of $510,000. Rava has already won more than 40 discrimination law suits in America including Club Med for having a ladies only promotion, the angels for not giving him a tote bag and many other venues for similar occurrences. Even the reporterRick Reilly described him as,

    "He’s a greasy manipulator who has found a small leak in American law and stuck an open wallet under it. When they wrote California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act in 1959 — the act Rava cites in his suits — they never thought soulless creatures like him would someday slink about the earth." Read morehere.

    Reports of harassment circulate from domestic violence shelter owners, mothers group owners, politicians and researchers of similar types of abuse. It was as if an engorged adult claimed discrimination against world vision for providing food to starving children. Rava is not the only mens rights crusader that is opening up a loophole in the law and catching it with his wallet. Dads in distress have managed to cypher a million dollars in funding over a statistic that they don’t even cater for. The highest suicide rate in the population is young aboriginal men. The largest aboriginal population is in the Northern Territory and dads in distress only provide a service in New South Wales and Victoria. There have been so many mens programs that they now out number the women and if you take out the programs for young women; there is nothing.

    The aim of dads in distress is to provide support through family law issues, yet there are no specific services for women going through the family court. Shelters and domestic violence counseling services are overloaded and are restricted in being able to support them through the family court. Some workers are restrained by funding or capacity and others are afraid of stepping on legal toes post shared parenting campaigns. Not only have these men attacked women accessing the family court, they have trampled on domestic violence victims and access to a much needed service. Richard Hillman, another mens rights campaigner tried to sue a child counsellor for taking protective action towards a child. The judge pointed out that he was asking him to put his duty of care above a child.

    They have gnawed away at our systems and protections that give women and children the opportunity to be free from violence. When some of them died as a result of their influence, they justified their deaths and some even tried to use it as a reason to push more of their laws. The logic was, "Dad was angry and suicidal, I can understand that, just give him the child and control and it wont happen again".

    Meanwhile on the other side of the world, young women die for speaking to another man or going out on their own – some die because they were raped. There might be a huge difference between the silent bloodshed that goes on within the home to the brutal public honor kills, but the rhetoric is no different and each egg the other on. It is the hate towards women, their autonomy and envy towards their ability to create life that drives these neanderthals towards acts of brutality and clearing all obstacles to commit those acts is their true agenda. There are many men like Rick, who refuse to be apart of such hypocrisy and very much a reason why survivors of domestic violence can and have loved again.

    Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) Stuart Showalter Neo Nazi-Fathers Rights Advocate-Abusers Rights Advocate Glenn Sacks-Abusers Advocate,Right Wing Terrorist- Fathers Rights. Warren Farrell, Mike J Murphy, Jeremy Swanson, Mark K Godbey, Donald Tenn, Stan Rains, Richard A. Gardner coined the term Parental Alienation Syndrome

    WordPress Tags: Neanderthals,Whilst,death,rights,crusader,lawsuit,Oakland,settlement,Rava,discrimination,America,Club,promotion,reporter,Rick,American,wallet,California,Unruh,Civil,earth,Read,Reports,harassment,violence,world,vision,food,children,loophole,Dads,statistic,population,Northern,Territory,South,Wales,Victoria,services,Some,workers,victims,Richard,Hillman,campaigner,action,result,logic,difference,rhetoric,autonomy,life,agenda,hypocrisy,Parental,Alienation,Syndrome,Stuart,Showalter,Nazi,Advocate,Abusers,Glenn,Terror,Warren,Farrell,Mike,Murphy,Jeremy,Swanson,Mark,Godbey,Donald,Tenn,Stan,Gardner,angels,venues,occurrences,creatures,owners,systems,protections,deaths,obstacles,Fathers,mens,women,towards

    %d bloggers like this: